Zhong-E Hou, Shu-Qiang Li. Integrative biogeography: Validating hypotheses of species distribution[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(1): 86-88. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2023.006
Citation: Zhong-E Hou, Shu-Qiang Li. Integrative biogeography: Validating hypotheses of species distribution[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(1): 86-88. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2023.006

Integrative biogeography: Validating hypotheses of species distribution

Funds: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070423) and Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program (2021xjkk0600)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Shu-Qiang Li, E-mail: lisq@ioz.ac.cn

  • Received Date: August 15, 2023
  • Accepted Date: October 01, 2023
  • Available Online: December 19, 2023
  • Published Date: December 19, 2023
  • Biogeography is a scientific field dedicated to the investigation of the origins and distribution patterns of organisms, as well as predicting future alterations in their geographical distributions (Cox & Moore, 2005). However, the majority of conclusions drawn within the field of biogeography are hypothetical. Rigorous testing of these biogeographic hypotheses remains a considerable challenge. This paper presents the concept of “integrative biogeography”, which emphasizes the experimental testing of biogeographic hypotheses through studies on geological history, as well as biotic and abiotic factors (Figure 1).

    Figure  1.  Workflow for integrative biogeography incorporating study of geological history and abiotic and biotic factors to explain biodiversity distribution patterns

    Geological events have long been recognized as key factors shaping biodiversity patterns (Rahbek et al., 2019). Landmass fragmentation has resulted in the extensive separation of lineages, while landmass collisions have brought together groups with diverse origins. These geological processes increase similarities in the diversity patterns of biotic assemblages. The geological vicariance hypothesis can be evaluated based on congruence between biogeographic reconstructions and geographic history, employing evidence from fossils and molecular phylogenies. The presence of similar fossils in distinct regions enables robust analyses of how continental plate collision and convergence have affected diversity patterns (Hou & Li, 2018). Phylogenetic inferences can also serve to evaluate overarching biogeographic patterns at broad taxonomic, spatial, and temporal scales.

    The first step in testing geological hypotheses involves the collection of data pertaining to the focal organisms, their distributions, and related geological events and climatic fluctuations. Subsequently, time-calibrated phylogenetic trees are constructed, which are essential for biogeographic reconstruction and diversification analyses, as well as accurate interpretation of results within an evolutionary framework. Finally, sensitivity analyses are applied to test correlations between geological and paleoclimatic transformation with both species richness and speciation rates.

    An increasing body of research has examined geological hypotheses. For example, diversification analyses of pollen fossils combined with molecular data of dipterocarp plants have elucidated how the India-Asia collision facilitated the dispersal of dipterocarps from India to analogous climatic zones in Southeast Asia (Bansal et al., 2022). Furthermore, phylogenetic reconstructions and observed shifts in the geographic ranges of flowering plants have demonstrated the impact of mountain formation and Asian monsoon intensification on the rich diversity of alpine flora on the Xizang Plateau (Ding et al., 2020). Thus, these studies highlight the substantial influence of geological events on biological patterns, and further demonstrate the utility of evolutionary patterns in deducing geological processes (Zhao et al., 2022).

    Environmental variables, such as climatic factors, soil composition, and land cover, are regarded as influential determinants that constrain species distribution and shape species richness gradients (Manel et al., 2020). The latitudinal diversity gradient, wherein species richness peaks near the equator and decreases toward the poles, is one of the most widespread large-scale patterns (Rabosky et al., 2018). One plausible hypothesis accounting for this gradient suggests that temperature affects species richness by increasing speciation rates and reducing extinction rates.

    Abiotic hypothesis assessment involves the study of how environmental predictors impact spatial diversity patterns using georeferenced data. Studies exploring abiotic hypotheses typically employ newly generated genetic data or data from public repositories (e.g., GenBank and Dryad), as well as environmental data on potential predictors derived from global databases (e.g., WorldClim, Global Biodiversity Information Facility), to conduct phylogenetic comparative analyses across broad taxonomic and spatial scales. Statistical analyses are then performed to evaluate the robustness of the correlations between key abiotic factors (e.g., annual mean temperature) with species richness and speciation rates within each grid cell. Comparative genomic analyses are conducted to identify potential genes related to thermoregulation. Finally, experiments are undertaken to test the thermal acclimation capabilities of the focal organisms, accomplished through comparisons of gene expression patterns between control and experimental groups.

    The proliferation of open datasets and the availability of advanced statistical computing packages such as R have enabled researchers to address groundbreaking questions. Notably, studies have established that annual sea surface temperature plays a pivotal role in shaping the patterns of intraspecific genetic variation and species richness in fish (Manel et al., 2020), including the latitudinal diversity gradient. Additionally, a robust negative association between speciation rates and both species richness and annual sea surface temperature has been observed, with speciation rates peaking at higher latitudes (Rabosky et al., 2018). The genetic mechanisms underpinning rapid speciation in the cold oceanic regions of the world warrant further investigation. Recent research has focused on clarifying the physiological and genetic mechanisms underlying biogeographic patterns via acclimation experiments, driven by advancements in genome sequencing technologies. For instance, research into the thermal acclimation of intertidal gastropods has revealed that heart rate responses to temperature increases and the up-regulation of genes involved in the protein-folding process have facilitated range expansion (Wang et al., 2022). These studies not only enhance our understanding of the complex correlations between diversity and environmental predictors, but also provide genetic insights into acclimation responses to environmental fluctuations.

    While geological events and abiotic factors can help elucidate whether geographic regions are suitable for studied species, their physiology, morphology, and genetics ultimately shape their evolutionary success. Among these factors, morphological innovations are important triggers of organismal diversification, especially lineage-restricted morphological traits that serve novel functions (Li et al., 2021). The evolutionary emergence of such innovations provides organisms with the opportunity to exploit new ecological niches.

    Biotic factors can be assessed by evaluating correlations between biogeographic patterns and the evolution of key morphological innovations, as well as by editing potential candidate genes responsible for morphological variation. The importance of biotic factors in shaping species distributions can be evaluated via a three-step approach. First, comprehensive data on DNA sequences, genomics, key morphological traits, and habitat and distribution characteristics are collected for the focal animals. Second, a phylogenetic tree is constructed using DNA or genomic sequences, with distribution areas and morphological traits subsequently mapped to the phylogeny to visualize trait variation under different biogeographic scenarios. Third, genomic analyses are conducted to identify genes involved in the development of key traits. Subsequent functional validation can be achieved through knockout experiments utilizing the CRISPR-Cas9 system. These knockout mutants enable the observation of loss-of-function phenotypes, which will undoubtedly reveal the genetic basis of key traits.

    Significant advances in multi-omics technologies and genome-editing tools, especially the CRISPR-Cas system, have aided investigations into the global patterns and morphological diversity of non-model organisms. For example, the radiation of cichlid fish in Lake Tanganyika is attributed to diversifications in body shape and jaw morphology, with species richness shown to be positively correlated with per-individual heterozygosity (Ronco et al., 2021). Research on seahorses has also revealed that the evolution of protective dermal spines is a response to predation pressure, thereby promoting their global diversification. Comparative genomic analyses have shown that the bone morphogenetic protein 3 (bmp3) gene experienced positive selection in spiny seahorse lineages, as confirmed by knockout experiments (Li et al., 2021). In a recent study, biogeographic analysis and genome editing demonstrated that marine-montane transitions were accompanied by gill innovation, potentially under the regulation of the SMC3 gene (Liu et al., 2023). The integration of morphological analyses and genome-editing validation into biogeographic studies will enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying global diversity patterns.

    Although knowledge regarding global biodiversity patterns and the vulnerability of biodiversity to global changes is expanding, the fundamental ecological and evolutionary processes that have shaped the complex diversity and biogeography of continental biotas remain unclear. The adoption of integrative biogeographical approaches has the potential to offer novel insights to facilitate the development of strategies for conserving biodiversity in the face of rapid climate change.

    We thank Wei Zhang for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

    Both authors participated in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Bansal M, Morley RJ, Nagaraju SK, et al. 2022. Southeast Asian Dipterocarp origin and diversification driven by Africa-India floristic interchange. Science, 375(6579): 455−460. doi: 10.1126/science.abk2177
    Cox CB, Moore PD. 2005. Biogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach. 7th ed. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
    Ding WN, Ree RH, Spicer RA, et al. 2020. Ancient orogenic and monsoon-driven assembly of the world’s richest temperate alpine flora. Science, 369(6503): 578−581. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4484
    Hou ZE, Li SQ. 2018. Tethyan changes shaped aquatic diversification. Biological Reviews, 93(2): 874−896. doi: 10.1111/brv.12376
    Li CY, Olave M, Hou YL, et al. 2021. Genome sequences reveal global dispersal routes and suggest convergent genetic adaptations in seahorse evolution. Nature Communications, 12(1): 1094. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21379-x
    Liu HG, Zheng YM, Zhu BY, et al. 2023. Marine–montane transitions coupled with gill and genetic convergence in extant crustacean. Sciences Advances, 9(25): eadg4011.
    Manel S, Guerin PE, Mouillot D, et al. 2020. Global determinants of freshwater and marine fish genetic diversity. Nature Communications, 11(1): 692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14409-7
    Rabosky DL, Chang J, Title PO, et al. 2018. An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature, 559(7714): 392−395. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0273-1
    Rahbek C, Borregaard MK, Antonelli A, et al. 2019. Building mountain biodiversity: geological and evolutionary processes. Science, 365(6458): 1114−1119. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0151
    Ronco F, Matschiner M, Böhne A, et al. 2021. Drivers and dynamics of a massive adaptive radiation in cichlid fishes. Nature, 589(7840): 76−81. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2930-4
    Wang J, Cheng ZY, Dong YW. 2022. Demographic, physiological and genetic factors linked to the poleward range expansion of the snail Nerita yoldii along the shoreline of China. Molecular Ecology, 31(17): 4510−4526. doi: 10.1111/mec.16610
    Zhao Z, Hou ZE, Li SQ. 2022. Cenozoic Tethyan changes dominated Eurasian animal evolution and diversity patterns. Zoological Research, 43(1): 3−13. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.322
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wilson J.E.M. Costa, José Leonardo, O. Mattos, Pedro F. Amorim, Axel M. Katz. Phylogeny and biogeography of a new South American catfish genus (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae) providing insights about role of Andean uplift in trichomycterine diversification[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2025, 2(2): 88-98. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2025.011
    [2]Ying Liu, Ru-Chuan He, Lin Wang, Christos Mammides, Rui-Chang Quan. Occupancy and coexistence patterns of sympatric felid species in human-disturbed tropical habitats of Xishuangbanna, southwestern China[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2025, 2(1): 55-64. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2025.002
    [3]Yi-Feng Hu, Xiao-Yun Wang, Yi Wu, Masaharu Motokawa, Wen-Hua Yu. Revisiting the taxonomy and distribution of Miniopterus (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae) bats in China based upon an integrated molecular-ecological-morphological approach[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2025, 2(1): 14-31. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2024.019
    [4]Chunying Wu, Jiahua Li, Ru Bai, Yinqiu Ji, Yuanmengran Chu, Shijie Zhao, Jiatuan Ding, Jianyan Tang, Changji Yang, Xueyou Li. Integrative multi-method survey for terrestrial vertebrate inventories[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2025.012
    [5]Yan-Peng Shen, Kanto Nishikawa, Jian-Ping Jiang, Masafumi Matsui, Ding-Qi Rao, Natsuhiko Yoshikawa, Atsushi Tominaga, Daosavanh Sanamxay. Lotic specialization in modern Asian newts (Caudata: Salamandridae): Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and ancestral traits based on combined DNA data[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(3): 191-200. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2023.010
    [6]Sang Ngoc Nguyen, Ba Dinh Vo, Nikolai L. Orlov, Khanh Duy Phan, Manh Van Le, Luan Thanh Nguyen, An Thien Tran, Robert W. Murphy, Jing Che. A new species of green rat snake (Squamata: Colubridae: Ptyas) from Vietnam[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(3): 180-190. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2024.013
    [7]Xingfeng Si, Tinghao Jin, Wande Li, Peng Ren, Qiang Wu, Di Zeng, Xue Zhang, Yuhao Zhao, Chen Zhu, Ping Ding. TIL20: A review of island biogeography and habitat fragmentation studies on subtropical reservoir islands of Thousand Island Lake, China[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(2): 89-105. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2024.001
    [8]Rong-Rong Zhang, Kuan Yang, Dian Luo, Shao-Xiong Ding. A new species of Bostrychus (Gobiiformes: Eleotridae) from the East China Sea[J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(1): 82-85. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2023.050
    [9]Fei Wu, Jian-Yun Gao, Dao Yan, Le Yang, Lu-Ming Liu, Shun-Yu Yao, Chang-Sheng Zuo, Jun Sun, Ge Gao, Jian-Yong Su, Li Luo, Ying-Chun Li, Ming Liu, Yuan-Fang Hu, Ming Wei, Xiao-Jun Yang.

    Bird species composition and conservation challenges in the Gaoligong Mountains, one of the most diverse bird areas in the world

    [J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(1): 20-50. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2023.001
    [10]Quan Li, Xue-You Li, Wen-Qiang Hu, Wen-Yu Song, Shui-Wang He, Hong-Jiao Wang, Zhe-Chang Hu, Meng-Cheng Li, Kenneth Otieno Onditi, Zhong-Zheng Chen, Chang-Zhe Pu, Yun Xiong, Cai-Hong Rao, Fu-You Zhang, Chang-Sheng Zuo, Xue-Long Jiang.

    Mammals of Gaoligong Mountain in China: Diversity, distribution, and conservation

    [J]. Zoological Research: Diversity and Conservation, 2024, 1(1): 3-19. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2023.005

Catalog

    Figures(1)

    Article views (298) PDF downloads (91) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return